| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| What was the world's tallest dinosaur? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 30 2014, 01:05 AM (4,829 Views) | |
| vegetarian | Jul 30 2014, 01:05 AM Post #1 |
|
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
What was the world's tallest dinosaur? |
![]() |
|
| Fist of the North Shrimp | Jul 30 2014, 02:05 AM Post #2 |
|
vá á orminum
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, there are multiple possibillities: Sauroposeidon Daxiatitan(cheater) The French Monster(If it really is a front heavy sauropod as the anatomy indicates Puertasaurus (though it really depends on its built) All of these are quite fragmentary so we cannot have a definitive answer. |
![]() |
|
| Fist of the North Shrimp | Jul 31 2014, 07:29 AM Post #3 |
|
vá á orminum
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1 answer and 48 views? Cmon guys, no other opinions? Is the dinosaur section dead? |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Jul 31 2014, 07:32 AM Post #4 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
"Brachiosaurus nougaredi" Amphicoelias fragillimus if it were to rear up (EDIT: I think I didn’t get that across well enough) Edited by theropod, Aug 9 2014, 07:39 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Fist of the North Shrimp | Jul 31 2014, 07:42 AM Post #5 |
|
vá á orminum
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I thought about those, but I habe a few Probleme with them. The former may be a giant Titanosaurus oft Argentinosaurus size(massive but not overtly tall). And the latter also has a problematic position, and diplodocoids dont seem to have the most flexible necks, which is consistant with their niche as grazers/low browsers. |
![]() |
|
| blaze | Jul 31 2014, 01:56 PM Post #6 |
|
Carnivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Based on sufficiently complete material, I think Giraffatitan, at about 13m with fragmentary specimens approaching 15m tall, Brachiosaurus probably is in the same ballpark as well as Alamosaurus, Argentinasaurus, Puertasaurus and Daxiatitan, If the adult Sauroposeidon matches a full grown Giraffatitan in size, its long neck vertebrae will give it an edge in height, will it be 18m tall as originally estimated? that I don't know. |
![]() |
|
| coherentsheaf | Aug 9 2014, 07:12 PM Post #7 |
|
Kleptoparasite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well ths really depends on the morphology of specific fragmentary specimen. Several macroarians were very large and depending on exact outlook very tall as well. |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Aug 9 2014, 10:04 PM Post #8 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
• Nima Sassani’s skeletal of G. brancai (HMNS 2) is 22.5m long through the neural canal and 14.8m tall based on the scale bar, however the humerus seems to be ~1% too long in that restoration. • EoFauna’s skeletal of the same specimen is 22m long and 12.8m tall, however the neck is less erect and if it was more vertical it would have probably have been considerably taller (adding the lenght of the neck in straight line to the height at the neck base gives over 15m). • Paul’s skeletal is 22.2m long based on the humerus and 13.7m tall. • Hartman’s skeletal is 23m long based on the humerus and 12.6m tall, again with a less erect neck (sum of straight-line neck lenght and height at base of neck=15.5m) http://paleo-king.deviantart.com/art/Giraffatitan-brancai-hi-fi-skeletal-289899517 http://eofauna.deviantart.com/art/Giraffatitan-brancai-skeletal-402260096 http://gspauldino.com/HunteriaBrachio.pdf http://scotthartman.deviantart.com/art/Brachiosaur-Comparison-169574617 |
![]() |
|
| Teratophoneus | Aug 10 2014, 01:10 AM Post #9 |
![]()
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I knew Sauroposeidon was the tallest. |
![]() |
|
| The Reptile | Aug 10 2014, 07:39 AM Post #10 |
![]()
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Let's not get into for-sure absolutes here people. But I think we can now feel confident saying that a genus of large brachiosaur was probably the tallest. Using such certainty creates unnecessary debating whether it be from actual height values (ex: 12 meters) or which dinosaur in question |
![]() |
|
| Spartan | Aug 10 2014, 10:00 AM Post #11 |
|
Kleptoparasite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Just heard of this dinosaur for the first time. I googled it and found this size comparison: http://i.imgur.com/uH2TrFx.png Could this be accurate? It's gigantic. |
![]() |
|
| The Reptile | Aug 11 2014, 06:04 AM Post #12 |
![]()
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
^120 tons is basically what seems to be one of the upper weight estimates for amphicoelias, which was HUGE. I doubt any brachiosaur would even come close to that |
![]() |
|
| blaze | Aug 11 2014, 06:17 AM Post #13 |
|
Carnivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
@Spartan Not accurate, Brachiosaurus altithorax itself has a very small sacrum for its body size compared to other large sauropods, despite Lapparent's referral to Brachiosaurus, there's nothing that suggests "Brachiosaurus" nougaredi is an actual species of that genus making isometric scaling like that probably wrong. For a comparison of how sacrum length can vary between sauropods of different sizes, Argentinosaurus (60+ tonnes) has a sacrum just a little longer than that of Apatosaurus louisae (~20 tonnes)... though, one might argue that Argentinosaurus and Apatosaurus are fairly distant. Edited by blaze, Aug 11 2014, 12:55 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Thalassophoneus | Mar 21 2015, 04:56 AM Post #14 |
![]()
Pelagic Killer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't know but the picture is right. Tyrannosaurus was definitely not the King of the Dinosaurs. Judging from the fact that Brachiosaurus Nougaredi existed during the Cretaceous period, according to recent studies, and from the fact that, just like someone here said Brachiosaurus had a sacrum quite too small for its body, I would say that Brachiosaurus Nougaredi might have been a titanosaur like Paralititan, which also lived in Africa during the Cretaceous period. Edited by Thalassophoneus, Mar 21 2015, 04:58 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Grimace | Mar 21 2015, 04:58 AM Post #15 |
|
Kleptoparasite
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There's no way whatsoever to tell. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Debate & discussion of dinosaur related topics. · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Dinosauria light | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
9:36 AM Jul 11
|
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy


)


![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)






9:36 AM Jul 11