| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Should white deer be specifically protected?; Should white deer be specifically protected? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Feb 21 2015, 07:45 PM (985 Views) | |
| maker | Feb 21 2015, 07:45 PM Post #1 |
|
Apex Predator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
http://protectthewhitedeer.com/ I am highly against the specific protection of white deer, being white is a negative trait for deer in these habitats, it's part of natural selection to kill them, but I'm not proposing to specifically kill them either, they should be treated the same as normal-colored deer, which is a normal prey item. Edited by maker, Feb 21 2015, 07:52 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| maker | Feb 25 2015, 06:04 PM Post #2 |
|
Apex Predator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Bump. |
![]() |
|
| Mesopredator | Feb 28 2015, 01:25 AM Post #3 |
|
Disaster taxa
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Of course they should, they are sacred. |
![]() |
|
| Creeper | Mar 1 2015, 09:30 AM Post #4 |
![]()
Carboniferous Arthropod
![]()
|
It's just a gene, are they trying to preserve that gene? The number of white deer that survive to adulthood is a reflection on human enroachment and eradication of the apex predator species (bears, wolves and cougars) in their habitat. Once upon a time it was considered sacred, back when it was rare and impressive for an animal to survive in to adulthood with albinism, but if the only animals hunting them (humans) are avoiding the white ones that is the gene that will be passed on. The albinism gene will be favorable to ensuring survival. |
![]() |
|
| Mesopredator | Mar 2 2015, 01:51 AM Post #5 |
|
Disaster taxa
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Oh, it really is considered to be sacred. |
![]() |
|
| kingkazma | Mar 2 2015, 01:53 AM Post #6 |
|
Apex Predator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
i saw dead piebald deer a few days ago actually. roadkill. these deer aren't special, leave them be or hunt them. i don't really care. |
![]() |
|
| Creeper | Mar 2 2015, 02:23 AM Post #7 |
![]()
Carboniferous Arthropod
![]()
|
I am aware, but cows are considered sacred too, should they be protected by law aswell? We can't let spirituality/religion dictate government sanction, every thing is sacred and/or taboo to some. While albinism isn't technically a dangerous genetic disorder it's certainly not optimal for a temperate forest species |
![]() |
|
| Mesopredator | Mar 2 2015, 02:46 AM Post #8 |
|
Disaster taxa
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I did know that in certain other cultures white animals are considered sacred or special. Anyway. To me it is okay if the protection is done on local level, preferably by the people themselves. |
![]() |
|
| maker | Mar 2 2015, 06:58 AM Post #9 |
|
Apex Predator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Protection by local people on private land is fine, but a state making law protecting it anywhere is unacceptable. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Zoological Debate & Discussion · Next Topic » |





![]](http://b2.ifrm.com/28122/87/0/p701956/pipright.png)





9:52 AM Jul 11