| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Sauropod necks | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 4 2015, 12:41 PM (906 Views) | |
| Agentjaguar | Jul 4 2015, 12:41 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There's actually NO evidence to suggest that some sauropods held their necks in an upright vertical position. The size of their hearts would have to be incredibly massive coupled with very high blood pressures to pump blood up a vertical neck. It's simply not anatomically advantageous. Horizontal necks make more sense. ![]() ^ that probably never existed. Edited by Agentjaguar, Jul 4 2015, 12:43 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Delude | Jul 4 2015, 01:07 PM Post #2 |
|
Unicellular Organism
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
While I agree that it would be difficult anatomically for an animal to support such a configuration as you speak of (the image in your post isn't working currently), there certainly would be advantages. Are you certain there's no evidence of it, though? I can't imagine paleontologists would continue to reconstruct animals that way if it wasn't viable, or somehow implied by their findings. Then again I've done relatively little personal research on sauropods. |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Jul 4 2015, 08:29 PM Post #3 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
If vertical necks were so disadvantageous, why do most mammals and birds with long necks hold them vertically, not horizontally? And yes, there is evidence that sauropods held their necks upright: http://www.app.pan.pl/archive/published/app54/app54-213.pdf http://svpow.com/2009/05/27/sauropods-held-their-necks-erect-just-like-rabbits/ http://svpow.com/2014/11/05/sauropods-neutral-neck-postures-were-really-weird/ http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0078214 In terms of blood flow, sure, this would require a very strong heart. I don’t see any problem with that, giraffes do the same thing. There are also benefits, such as the improved ability to feed on tall vegetation and the reduced muscular effort involved in supporting a vertical neck. The debate isn’t over yet, but this neck posture makes a lot of sense for many sauropods. |
![]() |
|
| J3st3r56 | Aug 15 2015, 06:16 PM Post #4 |
|
Unicellular Organism
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I personally find it hard to believe that a sauropod would hold its neck horizontal or vertical all of the time, it could provide unnecessary strain on the animal, i think its more believable to believe that sauropods held their necks at some where around the 45 degree mark to get the most out of their environments. |
![]() |
|
| DinosaurFan95 | Sep 18 2015, 05:15 AM Post #5 |
|
Omnivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You have to factor in weight, even with the vertebrae being hollowed out, you still have to take into account the weight of the veins, arteries, espohogus and flesh that made up the rest of the neck. Vertical or near vertical positions were probibly used only sparingly, when the only food was out of reach of the normal posture. As for Brachiosaurids, the neck probibly sat at a default 45 degrees, unless we are to assume less, in which case Brachiosaurids walked around with a "kink" where the neck met the body. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Debate & discussion of dinosaur related topics. · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Dinosauria light | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
9:39 AM Jul 11
|
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy


)



![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)




9:39 AM Jul 11