Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
Spinosaurus aegyptiacus v Tyrannosaurus rex
Topic Started: Jan 7 2012, 02:16 AM (459,158 Views)
Wolf Eagle
Member Avatar
M E G A P H Y S E T E R
[ *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Tyrannosaurus rex
Tyrannosaurus is a genus of coelurosaurian theropod dinosaur. The species Tyrannosaurus rex (rex meaning "king" in Latin), commonly abbreviated to T. rex, is a fixture in popular culture. It lived throughout what is now western North America, with a much wider range than other tyrannosaurids. Fossils are found in a variety of rock formations dating to the Maastrichtian age of the upper Cretaceous Period, 67 to 65.5 million years ago.[1] It was among the last non-avian dinosaurs to exist before the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. Like other tyrannosaurids, Tyrannosaurus was a bipedal carnivore with a massive skull balanced by a long, heavy tail. Relative to the large and powerful hindlimbs, Tyrannosaurus forelimbs were small, though unusually powerful for their size, and bore two clawed digits. Although other theropods rivaled or exceeded Tyrannosaurus rex in size, it was the largest known tyrannosaurid and one of the largest known land predators. By far the largest carnivore in its environment, Tyrannosaurus rex may have been an apex predator, preying upon hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, although some experts have suggested it was primarily a scavenger. The debate over Tyrannosaurus as apex predator or scavenger is among the longest running in paleontology. Tyrannosaurus rex was one of the largest land carnivores of all time; the largest complete specimen, FMNH PR2081 ("Sue"), measured 12.8 metres (42 ft) long, and was 4.0 metres (13.1 ft) tall at the hips. Mass estimates have varied widely over the years, from more than 7.2 metric tons (7.9 short tons), to less than 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons), with most modern estimates ranging between 5.4 and 6.8 metric tons (6.0 and 7.5 short tons). Packard et al. (2009) tested dinosaur mass estimation procedures on elephants and concluded that dinosaur estimations are flawed and produce over-estimations; thus, the weight of Tyrannosaurus could be much less than usually estimated. Other estimations have concluded that the largest known Tyrannosaurus specimens had a weight exceeding 9 tonnes.

Posted Image

Spinosaurus aegyptiacus
Spinosaurus is a genus of theropod dinosaur which lived in what is now North Africa, from the lower Albian to lower Cenomanian stages of the Cretaceous period, about 112 to 97 million years ago. Spinosaurus may be the largest of all known carnivorous dinosaurs, even larger than Tyrannosaurus and Giganotosaurus. Estimates published in 2005 and 2007 suggest that it was 12.6 to 18 metres (41 to 59 ft) in length and 7 to 20.9 tonnes (7.7 to 23.0 short tons) in weight. The skull of Spinosaurus was long and narrow like that of a modern crocodilian. Spinosaurus is thought to have eaten fish; evidence suggests that it lived both on land and in water like a modern crocodilian. The distinctive spines of Spinosaurus, which were long extensions of the vertebrae, grew to at least 1.65 meters (5.4 ft) long and were likely to have had skin connecting them, forming a sail-like structure, although some authors have suggested that the spines were covered in fat and formed a hump. Multiple functions have been put forward for this structure, including thermoregulation and display. Dal Sasso et al. (2005) assumed that Spinosaurus and Suchomimus had the same body proportions in relation to their skull lengths, and thereby calculated that Spinosaurus was 16 to 18 meters (52 to 59 ft) in length and 7 to 9 tonnes (7.7 to 9.9 short tons) in weight. The Dal Sasso et al. estimates were criticized because the skull length estimate was uncertain, and (assuming that body mass increases as the cube of body length) scaling Suchomimus which was 11 meters (36 ft) long and 3.8 tonnes (4.2 short tons) in mass to the range of estimated lengths of Spinosaurus would produce an estimated body mass of 11.7 to 16.7 tonnes (12.9 to 18.4 short tons).

Posted Image
Edited by Taipan, Apr 24 2015, 10:10 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
Ceratodromeus
Member Avatar
Aspiring herpetologist
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
spinosaurus rex
Mar 1 2014, 10:49 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:45 AM
Hatzegopteryx
Mar 1 2014, 10:40 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:35 AM
metatarsals don't drastically differ between individuals..
They do, as well as many proportions on different specimens vary, not to mention the countless frauds regarding UCMP 137538.
irrelavant how?
And oh i'm not even closed to finished, buddy.. Thomas the T-rex is about 34 ft long and 7,000-8,000 lbs at 17 years of age. This length and weight are close to what many say an adult Rex would average. However, at 17, Thomas still has a full year of rapid growth yet to come. Since T-rex put on nearly 10 lbs a day during this growth, Thomas would have gained over 3,650 pounds. So, at age 18, he would be 10,650-11,650 lbs. Probably would have been about 36-38 ft in length. That's comparable to what they say an adult Rex would average. But, Thomas would have had about 12 years of life before he died at about age 30. Tyrannosaurus rex grew throughout it's life. During those 12 years or so, Thomas probably could have put on over 2,000 lbs at least, probably more. With that, he would at least be over 13,650-14,650 lbs by the time he died with a length of over 40 ft. Thomas was a Male, keep that in mind. Females seem to be substantially bigger then the males. Based on this, it's my theory Thomas wasn't a freak individual, neither was sue( who seems to have gotten bigger then 12.4 meters, but i'll get to that). Not to mention again the c. Rex and F.Rex, it's entirely plausible they got to 14 meters, even if it's what they maxed out at.
c.rex is only 8-10 % complete. how can you assume 14 meters from that. the genetic variability in it is almost to much of a guess to make a proper length estimate.
this can be said for Spinosaurus too....
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Hatzegopteryx
Unicellular Organism
[ * ]
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:45 AM
Hatzegopteryx
Mar 1 2014, 10:40 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:35 AM
metatarsals don't drastically differ between individuals..
They do, as well as many proportions on different specimens vary, not to mention the countless frauds regarding UCMP 137538.
irrelavant how?
And oh i'm not even closed to finished, buddy.. Thomas the T-rex is about 34 ft long and 7,000-8,000 lbs at 17 years of age. This length and weight are close to what many say an adult Rex would average. However, at 17, Thomas still has a full year of rapid growth yet to come. Since T-rex put on nearly 10 lbs a day during this growth, Thomas would have gained over 3,650 pounds. So, at age 18, he would be 10,650-11,650 lbs. Probably would have been about 36-38 ft in length. That's comparable to what they say an adult Rex would average. But, Thomas would have had about 12 years of life before he died at about age 30. Tyrannosaurus rex grew throughout it's life. During those 12 years or so, Thomas probably could have put on over 2,000 lbs at least, probably more. With that, he would at least be over 13,650-14,650 lbs by the time he died with a length of over 40 ft. Thomas was a Male, keep that in mind. Females seem to be substantially bigger then the males. Based on this, it's my theory Thomas wasn't a freak individual, neither was sue( who seems to have gotten bigger then 12.4 meters, but i'll get to that). Not to mention again the c. Rex and F.Rex, it's entirely plausible they got to 14 meters, even if it's what they maxed out at.
More baseless speculation, I see. You totally lost the few creditibility you had with the genders, we have no evidence of sexual dimorphism on the species what so ever. And you are also speculating a lot of its mass gain throughout its life, show me at least 7 different statements that were proven that support your case or else you're wrong.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Hatzegopteryx
Unicellular Organism
[ * ]
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:48 AM
spinosaurus rex
Mar 1 2014, 10:43 AM
not to mention the fact that c.rex most likely wasn't 14 meters. its way to fragmentary to ussume that, being it's only 8- 10% complete. it's actually looking more like 12 meters and at the most, 13 meters if it was truely larger then sue
i posted the thread below
c.rex
isn't 10% what we currently have of Spinosaurus? lol or some where around that?
That post means nothing, it's not evidence..
Except we aren't making a bunch of baseless speculations around it like you are
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
spinosaurus rex
Member Avatar
Carnivore
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:48 AM
spinosaurus rex
Mar 1 2014, 10:43 AM
not to mention the fact that c.rex most likely wasn't 14 meters. its way to fragmentary to ussume that, being it's only 8- 10% complete. it's actually looking more like 12 meters and at the most, 13 meters if it was truely larger then sue
i posted the thread below
c.rex
isn't 10% what we currently have of Spinosaurus? lol or some where around that?
That post means nothing, it's not evidence..
that thread is 3 pages of pure debate on how large c.rex and f.rex was. it is evidence that i can concider reliable. saying it isn't without eny good reasoning is a bit biased. you delivered no evidence on them being 14 meters
Edited by spinosaurus rex, Mar 1 2014, 10:55 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Hatzegopteryx
Unicellular Organism
[ * ]
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:51 AM
spinosaurus rex
Mar 1 2014, 10:49 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:45 AM
Hatzegopteryx
Mar 1 2014, 10:40 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:35 AM
metatarsals don't drastically differ between individuals..
They do, as well as many proportions on different specimens vary, not to mention the countless frauds regarding UCMP 137538.
irrelavant how?
And oh i'm not even closed to finished, buddy.. Thomas the T-rex is about 34 ft long and 7,000-8,000 lbs at 17 years of age. This length and weight are close to what many say an adult Rex would average. However, at 17, Thomas still has a full year of rapid growth yet to come. Since T-rex put on nearly 10 lbs a day during this growth, Thomas would have gained over 3,650 pounds. So, at age 18, he would be 10,650-11,650 lbs. Probably would have been about 36-38 ft in length. That's comparable to what they say an adult Rex would average. But, Thomas would have had about 12 years of life before he died at about age 30. Tyrannosaurus rex grew throughout it's life. During those 12 years or so, Thomas probably could have put on over 2,000 lbs at least, probably more. With that, he would at least be over 13,650-14,650 lbs by the time he died with a length of over 40 ft. Thomas was a Male, keep that in mind. Females seem to be substantially bigger then the males. Based on this, it's my theory Thomas wasn't a freak individual, neither was sue( who seems to have gotten bigger then 12.4 meters, but i'll get to that). Not to mention again the c. Rex and F.Rex, it's entirely plausible they got to 14 meters, even if it's what they maxed out at.
c.rex is only 8-10 % complete. how can you assume 14 meters from that. the genetic variability in it is almost to much of a guess to make a proper length estimate.
this can be said for Spinosaurus too....
So? It doesn't strenghten your argument, you tried getting him in hipocrisy but he isn't making a load of baseless speculations one after another about a fragmentary specimen.
Edited by Hatzegopteryx, Mar 1 2014, 10:54 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ausar
Member Avatar
Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Edited: nvm.
Edited by Ausar, Mar 1 2014, 10:56 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Hatzegopteryx
Unicellular Organism
[ * ]
You guys are advertising another forum, aren't those things avoided here?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ausar
Member Avatar
Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
^I try to, but he said he was from there too. I got a bit curious. I suggest we edit our posts.
Edited by Ausar, Mar 1 2014, 11:00 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Hatzegopteryx
Unicellular Organism
[ * ]
Yeah, you should do that, just edit the names out of the posts I guess that would be fine.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ceratodromeus
Member Avatar
Aspiring herpetologist
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Hatzegopteryx
Mar 1 2014, 10:53 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:51 AM
spinosaurus rex
Mar 1 2014, 10:49 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:45 AM
Hatzegopteryx
Mar 1 2014, 10:40 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:35 AM
metatarsals don't drastically differ between individuals..
They do, as well as many proportions on different specimens vary, not to mention the countless frauds regarding UCMP 137538.
irrelavant how?
And oh i'm not even closed to finished, buddy.. Thomas the T-rex is about 34 ft long and 7,000-8,000 lbs at 17 years of age. This length and weight are close to what many say an adult Rex would average. However, at 17, Thomas still has a full year of rapid growth yet to come. Since T-rex put on nearly 10 lbs a day during this growth, Thomas would have gained over 3,650 pounds. So, at age 18, he would be 10,650-11,650 lbs. Probably would have been about 36-38 ft in length. That's comparable to what they say an adult Rex would average. But, Thomas would have had about 12 years of life before he died at about age 30. Tyrannosaurus rex grew throughout it's life. During those 12 years or so, Thomas probably could have put on over 2,000 lbs at least, probably more. With that, he would at least be over 13,650-14,650 lbs by the time he died with a length of over 40 ft. Thomas was a Male, keep that in mind. Females seem to be substantially bigger then the males. Based on this, it's my theory Thomas wasn't a freak individual, neither was sue( who seems to have gotten bigger then 12.4 meters, but i'll get to that). Not to mention again the c. Rex and F.Rex, it's entirely plausible they got to 14 meters, even if it's what they maxed out at.
c.rex is only 8-10 % complete. how can you assume 14 meters from that. the genetic variability in it is almost to much of a guess to make a proper length estimate.
this can be said for Spinosaurus too....
So? It doesn't strenghten your argument, you tried getting him in hipocrisy but he isn't making a load of baseless speculations one after another about a fragmentary specimen.
you guys....kill me...7? can you name 7 for your claims? "if not your wrong", bud. while not 7. i can provide some..
Dinosaur growth basicshttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0081917
Tyrannosaurus growthhttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026037
Here's a Tyrannosaurus growth chart..
Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ceratodromeus
Member Avatar
Aspiring herpetologist
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Dinopithecus
Mar 1 2014, 10:54 AM
Edited: nvm.
i will PM you or something..
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Hatzegopteryx
Unicellular Organism
[ * ]
I am not the one making a bunch of baseless assumptions about colour changing, sexual dimorphism and many others. Back your claims with evidence, what I am doing here is simply debunking those baseless speculations
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ausar
Member Avatar
Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can!
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 11:02 AM
Dinopithecus
Mar 1 2014, 10:54 AM
Edited: nvm.
i will PM you or something..
PMs are disabled.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Ceratodromeus
Member Avatar
Aspiring herpetologist
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Hatzegopteryx
Mar 1 2014, 11:04 AM
I am not the one making a bunch of baseless assumptions about colour changing, sexual dimorphism and many others. Back your claims with evidence, what I am doing here is simply debunking those baseless speculations
i didn't say any where i thought spinosaurus could change its sail color? XD come on man....i was simply showing you guys an interpretation from another writer, no where did i claim it was proof of anything.
As for the sexual dimorphism in tyrannosaurs, that was my theory, which i don't even whole heardtedly believe any more. Got me there. What "many others" did i claim? tell me.. i'm dying to know.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
spinosaurus rex
Member Avatar
Carnivore
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 11:00 AM
Hatzegopteryx
Mar 1 2014, 10:53 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:51 AM
spinosaurus rex
Mar 1 2014, 10:49 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:45 AM
Hatzegopteryx
Mar 1 2014, 10:40 AM
Carnosaur18
Mar 1 2014, 10:35 AM
metatarsals don't drastically differ between individuals..
They do, as well as many proportions on different specimens vary, not to mention the countless frauds regarding UCMP 137538.
irrelavant how?
And oh i'm not even closed to finished, buddy.. Thomas the T-rex is about 34 ft long and 7,000-8,000 lbs at 17 years of age. This length and weight are close to what many say an adult Rex would average. However, at 17, Thomas still has a full year of rapid growth yet to come. Since T-rex put on nearly 10 lbs a day during this growth, Thomas would have gained over 3,650 pounds. So, at age 18, he would be 10,650-11,650 lbs. Probably would have been about 36-38 ft in length. That's comparable to what they say an adult Rex would average. But, Thomas would have had about 12 years of life before he died at about age 30. Tyrannosaurus rex grew throughout it's life. During those 12 years or so, Thomas probably could have put on over 2,000 lbs at least, probably more. With that, he would at least be over 13,650-14,650 lbs by the time he died with a length of over 40 ft. Thomas was a Male, keep that in mind. Females seem to be substantially bigger then the males. Based on this, it's my theory Thomas wasn't a freak individual, neither was sue( who seems to have gotten bigger then 12.4 meters, but i'll get to that). Not to mention again the c. Rex and F.Rex, it's entirely plausible they got to 14 meters, even if it's what they maxed out at.
c.rex is only 8-10 % complete. how can you assume 14 meters from that. the genetic variability in it is almost to much of a guess to make a proper length estimate.
this can be said for Spinosaurus too....
So? It doesn't strenghten your argument, you tried getting him in hipocrisy but he isn't making a load of baseless speculations one after another about a fragmentary specimen.
you guys....kill me...7? can you name 7 for your claims? "if not your wrong", bud. while not 7. i can provide some..
Dinosaur growth basicshttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0081917
Tyrannosaurus growthhttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0026037
Here's a Tyrannosaurus growth chart..
Posted Image
those post don't even suggest anything about the fragmentary 14 meter individuales. it shown they had a massive growth rate, but provides nothing for the size estimates of a 14 meter tyrannosaur
Edited by spinosaurus rex, Mar 1 2014, 11:10 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Dinosauria Interspecific Conflict · Next Topic »
Add Reply

Find this theme on Forum2Forum.net & ZNR exclusively.