| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Spinosaurus aegyptiacus v Tyrannosaurus rex | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 7 2012, 02:16 AM (459,338 Views) | |
| Wolf Eagle | Jan 7 2012, 02:16 AM Post #1 |
![]()
M E G A P H Y S E T E R
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Tyrannosaurus rex Tyrannosaurus is a genus of coelurosaurian theropod dinosaur. The species Tyrannosaurus rex (rex meaning "king" in Latin), commonly abbreviated to T. rex, is a fixture in popular culture. It lived throughout what is now western North America, with a much wider range than other tyrannosaurids. Fossils are found in a variety of rock formations dating to the Maastrichtian age of the upper Cretaceous Period, 67 to 65.5 million years ago.[1] It was among the last non-avian dinosaurs to exist before the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. Like other tyrannosaurids, Tyrannosaurus was a bipedal carnivore with a massive skull balanced by a long, heavy tail. Relative to the large and powerful hindlimbs, Tyrannosaurus forelimbs were small, though unusually powerful for their size, and bore two clawed digits. Although other theropods rivaled or exceeded Tyrannosaurus rex in size, it was the largest known tyrannosaurid and one of the largest known land predators. By far the largest carnivore in its environment, Tyrannosaurus rex may have been an apex predator, preying upon hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, although some experts have suggested it was primarily a scavenger. The debate over Tyrannosaurus as apex predator or scavenger is among the longest running in paleontology. Tyrannosaurus rex was one of the largest land carnivores of all time; the largest complete specimen, FMNH PR2081 ("Sue"), measured 12.8 metres (42 ft) long, and was 4.0 metres (13.1 ft) tall at the hips. Mass estimates have varied widely over the years, from more than 7.2 metric tons (7.9 short tons), to less than 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons), with most modern estimates ranging between 5.4 and 6.8 metric tons (6.0 and 7.5 short tons). Packard et al. (2009) tested dinosaur mass estimation procedures on elephants and concluded that dinosaur estimations are flawed and produce over-estimations; thus, the weight of Tyrannosaurus could be much less than usually estimated. Other estimations have concluded that the largest known Tyrannosaurus specimens had a weight exceeding 9 tonnes. ![]() Spinosaurus aegyptiacus Spinosaurus is a genus of theropod dinosaur which lived in what is now North Africa, from the lower Albian to lower Cenomanian stages of the Cretaceous period, about 112 to 97 million years ago. Spinosaurus may be the largest of all known carnivorous dinosaurs, even larger than Tyrannosaurus and Giganotosaurus. Estimates published in 2005 and 2007 suggest that it was 12.6 to 18 metres (41 to 59 ft) in length and 7 to 20.9 tonnes (7.7 to 23.0 short tons) in weight. The skull of Spinosaurus was long and narrow like that of a modern crocodilian. Spinosaurus is thought to have eaten fish; evidence suggests that it lived both on land and in water like a modern crocodilian. The distinctive spines of Spinosaurus, which were long extensions of the vertebrae, grew to at least 1.65 meters (5.4 ft) long and were likely to have had skin connecting them, forming a sail-like structure, although some authors have suggested that the spines were covered in fat and formed a hump. Multiple functions have been put forward for this structure, including thermoregulation and display. Dal Sasso et al. (2005) assumed that Spinosaurus and Suchomimus had the same body proportions in relation to their skull lengths, and thereby calculated that Spinosaurus was 16 to 18 meters (52 to 59 ft) in length and 7 to 9 tonnes (7.7 to 9.9 short tons) in weight. The Dal Sasso et al. estimates were criticized because the skull length estimate was uncertain, and (assuming that body mass increases as the cube of body length) scaling Suchomimus which was 11 meters (36 ft) long and 3.8 tonnes (4.2 short tons) in mass to the range of estimated lengths of Spinosaurus would produce an estimated body mass of 11.7 to 16.7 tonnes (12.9 to 18.4 short tons).
Edited by Taipan, Apr 24 2015, 10:10 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Jinfengopteryx | Sep 28 2012, 03:32 AM Post #646 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Than I can't help you, I have it above Homepage URL. |
![]() |
|
| Verdugo | Sep 28 2012, 03:45 AM Post #647 |
![]()
Large Carnivores Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Maybe i need to have 2000 + posts to have that option. |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Sep 28 2012, 04:26 AM Post #648 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well, broly was able to use it, when he had less than 2000. |
![]() |
|
| Carcharadon | Sep 28 2012, 05:19 AM Post #649 |
![]()
Shark Toothed Reptile
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I managed to do it too. |
![]() |
|
| Carcharadon | Sep 28 2012, 10:01 AM Post #650 |
![]()
Shark Toothed Reptile
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Also, that Planet Dino Spinosaurus pic that verdugo found for the OP is definetly the best
|
![]() |
|
| Verdugo | Sep 28 2012, 03:11 PM Post #651 |
![]()
Large Carnivores Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Of course, that is the best PD picture i can find . I see you use as your signature. But i don't know how long it will take for that picture to be officially used for the OP
|
![]() |
|
| theropod | Sep 29 2012, 01:44 AM Post #652 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
veeeeery long, not even all maniraptoran pics show the animals with feathers... |
![]() |
|
| Verdugo | Sep 29 2012, 03:20 PM Post #653 |
![]()
Large Carnivores Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I think we should make a request to @DinoMike. The OP pics really need a BIG update
|
![]() |
|
| theropod | Sep 29 2012, 08:14 PM Post #654 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There are enough people who draw accurate reconstructions, finding enough images shouldn´t be a problem actually. DinoMike: if you don´t find an accurate picture you can tell me and I can try to do one if you want. |
![]() |
|
| Carcharadon | Oct 2 2012, 08:19 AM Post #655 |
![]()
Shark Toothed Reptile
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Thanks but its not on my signature anymore |
![]() |
|
| SpinoInWonderland | Oct 3 2012, 11:46 PM Post #656 |
|
The madness has come back...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I have made a video explaining why Spinosaurus is the victor. |
![]() |
|
| Verdugo | Oct 3 2012, 11:58 PM Post #657 |
![]()
Large Carnivores Enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nice video, i think it would be better if you sit and talk, explain and discuss in person But do you think it is necessary ?? I attempted to click thumb down, but it doesn't deserve my effort
|
![]() |
|
| SpinoInWonderland | Oct 4 2012, 12:05 AM Post #658 |
|
The madness has come back...
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
It is very necessary, fanboys like Palaeosaurus are annoying and can't comprehend the fact that Tyrannosaurus isn't the biggest and baddest And I like it better that way. I don't like revealing myself in person
Edited by SpinoInWonderland, Oct 4 2012, 12:14 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Gecko | Oct 4 2012, 12:54 AM Post #659 |
|
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
You know the more and more I read about Spinosaurus, the more and more I doubt it's size advantage. (It did have one but it's not as big as some would think...) Have you read this blog post comparing the Spinosaurus holotype to Sue. I used google translate so you can kind of read it, and get the idea of it. Take a look at the images: Link Link Sue is way more robust and comparable in size to Spinosaurus(Sue appears to at least weigh more than the holotype, I'm not sure about the bigger Spinosarus skull but I imagine it wouldn't be much bigger than Sue) |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Oct 4 2012, 12:56 AM Post #660 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
then I guess you are imagining it not as it is. the spinosaurus holotype is merely 13-14m long and it is sub-adult. The dal-sasso specimen is acknowledged to have been much bigger. interesting images, but imagine a spinosaurus which is 30% bigger in linear dimensions and 2,2 times the weight... Edited by theropod, Oct 4 2012, 12:58 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| 2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Dinosauria Interspecific Conflict · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Dinosauria light | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:24 AM Jul 14
|
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy


)



![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)







2:24 AM Jul 14