| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Spectacled Bear - Tremarctos ornatus | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jan 7 2012, 07:52 PM (5,295 Views) | |
| Taipan | Jan 7 2012, 07:52 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
Spectacled Bear - Tremarctos ornatus![]() These are the last remaining representatives of the short-faced bears. Life span 20-25 years Statistics Body length: 150-180cm, Weight: males: 100-155kg, females: 64-82kg. Physical Description Spectacled bears have thick black or brown fur with medium length hair. They have pale yellow bands across the base of nose and sometimes across their foreheads to the cheeks and throat, giving the appearance of a pair of spectacles. Lines or patches of white may also extend onto the chest. Distribution Spectacled bears are the only bear species found in South America. They inhabit the mountainous regions of Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela. Habitat Spectacled bears occupy a variety of habitats, including grassland, brush, rainforests, dry forest and coastal scrub desert, although they are typically found in mountain forest. Diet They have a varied diet depending on seasonal and altitudinal food availability, but they favour plants such as bromeliads, palms, orchids and fruits. A lesser part of their diet is made up of nuts, seeds, carrion and small animals. Behaviour Little is known of the social behaviour of spectacled bears in the wild, but they are thought to be solitary except for mothers and their cubs. They use a variety of calls to communicate with one another vocally in captivity. They are excellent climbers and often construct platforms in trees for resting and feeding. Spectacled bears are thought to be nocturnal Reproduction Mating takes place between May and August, and females give birth to 1-3 cubs from January to March. Conservation status Spectacled bears are listed as Vulnerable by the IUCN and are on CITES: Appendix I. Their main threat is loss of habitat, but they are also hunted for sport and by farmers. Farmers also spray special pesticides on to their corn fields to protect their crops from the bears. Notes Spectacled bears have only 13 pairs of ribs compared to 14 pairs in other bears, and are the last remaining representatives of the extinct short-faced bears. The largest specimen recorded is estimated to have weighed 1,000kg, but they were thought to average at about 600kg. They roamed the Americas about 2 million-10,000 years ago. |
![]() |
|
| Ursus arctos | Jan 11 2012, 12:09 AM Post #2 |
|
Autotrophic Organism
![]()
|
[quote author=thewho board=ursidae thread=1799 post=62658 time=1252419169]"X indicates the months during which bears ate the food items, confirmations on the months when food items are eaten were based on direct observations of feeding bears and fresh field evidence less than 2 weeks old... In the case of animal foods, r denotes the months during which the animals grazed within 100m of bear sign and are reported to be eaten" ![]() So they sometimes try to throw the cow off a cliff or slope as well..? Andean Bear-Cattle Interactions and Tree Nest Use in Bolivia and Venezuela "No direct evidence of predation on cattle by Andean bears was gathered during the Andean bear surveys done between 1985 and 1987 in Venezuela. However, some evidence supports cattle predation by Andean bears(Goldstein 1991a), including signs of struggle(deep and long hoof marks on the ground, uprooted vegetation, cattle with claw marks), the number of cattle lost at each site, the absence of sign from other possible predators, and the cessation of catle losses after the killing of bears". [/quote]
|
![]() |
|
| pars | Jan 14 2013, 11:49 PM Post #3 |
|
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Some Andean bears seem to develop more predatory attitude comparde to plant eating specimen of their species. Reports say their predation on cattle, tapir, guanaco, vicuna, lama, white tailed deer, goat... From: http://www.bearbiology.com/fileadmin/tpl/Downloads/URSUS/Vol_15_1/Troya_Cuesta_15_1_.pdf Discussion Several factors could have influenced scat collection. More scats were collected during January-February, when the weather was dry and scats were more easily observed and preserved for collection. Rain likely was the reason for the low number of scats collected during July-August (the peak of the rainy season). The abundant rains made it more difficult to survey and locate bear sign, and scats decayed faster. March and April had the lowest number of scats; although it begins to rain heavily in April, March remains a rather dry month. Unlike July and August when fruits are abundant in montane forests, fruits are scarce during March and April, and that reduction in food availability may have reduced food intake and resulted in fewer observed scats. Bears could have moved outside the study area during those months, although we have no data to support either assertion. Bears apparently fed most frequently on the meristematic tissues and leave bases of terrestrialb romeliads, such as Puya spp. and Greigia spp. Both genera occurred in distinct patches, but the former genus was abundant in the grass paramo, whereas the latter was abundant in mixed pairamo forests. Other genera of bromeliads, such as Tillandsia spp. and Pitcairnia spp., also were eaten by bears (Table 3), although less frequently. In Peru, Peyton (1980) found that bear diets included various plants and animals, with bromeliads and fruits as the main items. In Bolivia, D. Rumiz (D. Rumiz, C. Eulert, and R. Arispe, 1997, Situacion del oso andino [Tremarctos ornatus] en los Parques nacionales Amboro y Carrasco, Bolivia, Ponencia presentada en el Tercer Congreso Intemacional sobre manejo de fauna en la Amazonia, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, unpublished presentation) also observed that bears fed on a variety of plants and animals; bromeliads were the most abundant item in the diet of Andean bears. Suarez (1985, 1989) studied bear diets in Antisana, Ecuador, and reported that Andean bears were omnivorous and most frequently consumed bromeliads. The high frequency of bromeliads in bear scats in our study area may be explained by the fact that these plants can be found in 5 of the 6 vegetation types within the study area. Moreover, because bears only consume the stem and leave bases, this food source is available all year. The distribution of bromeliads in the paramo is patchy, and bears may be able to feed for some timewithin such patches. Indeed, Goldstein (2004) found that Andean bears in Venezuela selectively fed within patches of Puya spp. with a greater concentration of plants. Other food habit studies on Andean bears have reported that animals such as rodents, deer, tapirs (Tapirus pinchaque), cattle, and even birds are part of the diet (Peyton 1980, Suarez 1985, Mondolfi 1989, Goldstein 1992). No mammal or bird remains were found in scats during our study. Although scats containing remains of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) and cattle were collected in 2001, animal matter did not seem to represent an important food source for bears in our study area. It is possible, however, that animal matterw as underestimatedin our study because it tends to be more efficiently digested and thus underrepresented in scats (Pritchard and Robbins 1990, Hewitt and Robbins 1996). The different vegetation types in the Oyacachi River Basin offer a variety of plants to which bears have easy access. Moreover, paramo habitats also provide berries such as Escallonia myrtilloides, Pernettya prostrata, and several species of the genus Rubus. Montane and cloud forests provide bears with berries from the family Ericacea and fruits of the genus Rubus, which have been reported as part of Andean bear diets in other countries (Peyton 1980, Mondolfi 1989). Trees of the genera Oreopanax, Miconia, Eugenia, Ocotea, Hyeronima, and Ficus also area bundantin those forests (Baez et al. 1999), potentially providing additional food sources for bears. Fruits were the second most frequent item we observed in the diet. Fruits of 5 species of plants were eaten by bears (Table 3); fruits of motilon (Hyeronima macrocarpa) were eaten most frequently. These fruits are fleshy and relatively large (3 x 2 cm). The higher frequency of these fruits in the diet may be related to factors such as availability, taste, texture, or size. H. macrocarpa produces sweet, edible fruits that are consumed by people in the Oyacachi River Valley (F. Quinatoa, park guard, Cayambe Coca Ecological Reserve, personal communication). Fruits of this species were abundant in the montane forests during June, July, and January. Indeed, observations of habitat use indicate that these 2 habitats received more use by bears during January and July (Cuesta et al. 2003). However, more information on the phenology of this plant species is needed. During other months (May-Jun and Sep-Dec), bears fed more frequently in the grass paramo and the mixed paramo forest, where food is available all year long. Peyton (1980, 1987) found that bears in Peru used paramo between February and April, when fruits were scarce in the lower humid forests; bears moved through the study area according to the fruiting periods of the species they consumed. Similarly, Suairez (1985) found that bears in Antisana, Ecuador, visited paramos only between February and July. |
![]() |
|
| pars | Jan 14 2013, 11:52 PM Post #4 |
|
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Controversial arguments about predatory behaviour of Andean Bear From: http://www.andeanbear.org/papers/english/ecology-and-behavior-of-reintroduced-andean-bears-en.pdf Although there have been several reports of livestock pillaging on the part of Andean bears (Peyton 1983, Suárez 1985, Domico 1988, Mondolfi 1989; Goldstein 1988, 1991; Poveda 1999), this animal is not a true hunter; it can be more scavenger than predator (Peyton 1980). Also the Andean bear is anatomically designed to crush and to squeeze the vegetation on which it feeds, therefore it is the most herbivorous of all the bear species (Peyton 1999). Paddington hunted, killing 3 calves of approximately 2 and 3 months of age, one at a time. From the wounds found on the bodies, tracks and information from witnesses, we deduced that the bear attacked in the open fields, and dragged the calf about 30 meters to his terrestrial nest in the interior of the forest, in a similar situation to the one reported by Goldstein (1988) and Poveda (1999). The purpose of this behavior was to hide the calf and to devour it peacefully; to do this the bear held the victim strongly with his jaws at the height of the loin. In the struggle and when trying to hold it, it broke the neck and other bones of the prey. In all three cases, he opened a hole in the same place from where he held the prey, tore into the abdominal cavity, stopping to ingest the viscera first and continuing later with the meat. Once satisfied, he did not abandon his prey, but rather continued hunting in the area where he kept his prey. He also took belongings like blankets, utensils, and provisions that he "stole" from loggers to his terrestrial nest. |
![]() |
|
| pars | Jan 15 2013, 12:20 AM Post #5 |
|
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
As in the Ursus' post, local people make a distinction between more predator andean bears and herbivore andean bears. As explained in the part of the study below, locals suffer seriously from attacks of more carnivore specimean of andean bear on cattles... From: http://nelson.wisc.edu/people/treves/Pubs/Zug_MSThesis.pdf In Colepato, Andean bears are viewed both with fear and reverence. Andean bear-‐cattle conflicts occur when cattle is left unattended for long periods of time in pastures far from human settlements (Flores et al. 2005). People who have lost cattle to bear attacks generally fear the bears and believe a future attack is inevitable (Achig & Santillán 2009). The community believes there are two species of bears, distinguished by their diets. The vegetarian bear is called “aguaronguero” from the Kichwa word “aguarongo” for the puya plant (family: Bromeliaceae). The cattle-‐eating bear is “huagrero” from Kichwa word “huagra” for cattle (S. White, pers. comm.). The residents of Colepato have had their livestock attacked by wildlife (Achig & Santillán 2009) but despite their location within Sangay National Park boundaries the community does not receive any assistance from park officials when their livestock is attacked. The park itself is under-‐funded (annual budget of $4080 to manage the 110,000 ha southern sector, C. Schloegel, pers. comm.) and anecdotal evidence suggests park staff lacks the necessary training to address human-‐bear conflicts adequately. In a survey of Ecuadorian protected area management and legal enforcement activities, Naughton and Silva ranked the southern region of SNP among the lowest of the 14 parks surveyed (unpub. data). Despite its celebrated species richness, southern SNP is basically a park on paper. Lack of assistance from park officials makes the community feel that to protect the livestock they can either hunt bears(the species they tend to blame for all cattle attacks) or move their cattle out of unsupervised pastures in the páramo into crowded pastures close to their homes. The community claims it does not actively hunt or kill bears on their land (see Chapter 1) and the choice to move cattle closer to their homes may be unsustainable for some in the long-‐term (Achig & Santillán 2009). |
![]() |
|
| Warsaw2014 | Dec 8 2014, 03:51 AM Post #6 |
|
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Bear Ecology The ecology of the Andean bear, Tremarctos ornatus, is still being investigated, by this project and others, and there is still much to learn. Range & habitat: The elusive Andean Bear lives in the Andes Mountains. It the only species of South American bear, found in a narrow strip running from western Venezuela through the Andes in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia, and ending in northwest Argentina. Bear habitat can include cloud forests, dry forests and paramo or high grasslands. The distribution of the Andean bear is predominantly restricted by geographical boundaries like deserts (e.g. the Atacama desert accounts for the complete lack of bear populations in Chile). Bears are an "endangered" species in Ecuador, mostly due to habitat fragmentation caused by livestock farming and logging. Farmers sometimes shoot the bears because they eat corn (this is illegal). Appearance: The Andean bear has a shorter nose than the other 7 bear species, similar to that of a dog. The Andean bear has a long, thick black coat, except around the muzzle, which is tawny or brown, often with white or brown marks around the eyes (from which it gets its common name, the spectacled bear) that may extend to the throat and chest. Not all spectacled bears have "spectacle" markings, some have plain black faces, which is why scientists prefer to refer to them as Andean bears. Bear size: Male Andean bears are much larger than females, with males often growing to a size of 2.2 metres from head to toe. The largest male Andean bear ever recorded measured 2.4 metres. Males may weigh up to 200kg. Females are much smaller, rarely exceeding heights of 1.6 metres from head to toe. The Andean Bear is smaller than polar bears and grizzly bears, but larger than sun bears and asian black bears. Andean bears are just a little smaller than American black bears. Bear lifespan: The bears' lifespan in the wild is probably rarely longer than 20 years due to the stresses of natural life and sporadic food availability. Andean bears may live as long as 35 to 40 years in captivity. Senses: Like all bears, Andean bears have a highly developed sense of smell (olfaction). Their vision and hearing senses are adequate but inferior to their sense of smell. Bear diet: Andean bears have a varied diet. Taxonomically they are classed as carnivores, although they are omnivorous and opportunistic feeders and in reality are predominantly vegetarian. Like all ursids (bears) they have a sweet tooth and enjoy honey from any bees' nests or honeycombs they find. In the forest the bears eat palmitos (hearts of palm), the soft insides of suro (Chusquea sp.) (a kind of bamboo), the soft bases of huaycundos (bromeliads), and various types of fruits. In the paramo, they eat the soft bases of puyas (Puya sp., see photo to the right) and a huckleberry-like fruit called mortiño (Vaccinium sp.). With forests increasingly being felled and replaced by cornfields, bears have developed the taste for sweet corn or maize. Although this is not a natural food source, in the corn season a bear's diet consists of a large proportion of maize. Like all carnivores, Andean bears need a source of protein for tissue growth. The bears dig in the earth in search of beetles, worms and insects as a source of protein, and occasionally feed on small mammals. In very rare cases, in a few parts of their range, there have been incidents of male bears attacking livestock. This is believed to be due to a lack of food in the forest forcing bears to search for food elsewhere. Unlike felines, the bears don’t go for the jugular, but jump on the cow's back and take chunks out of the tender shoulder region while the cow is still alive. Even if the cow survives this attack, it will probably be killed as its neck or spine snap when the bear drags it to a more sheltered spot to eat. Andean bears are very strong and an adult male can drag a fully-grown cow or even a bull. Taxonomy: the Andean bear is classified as a mammal, a carnivore, an Ursidae (bear) and the only surviving species of the shortfaced bears, the Tremarctinae. Ecological Role: Andean bears are a keystone species, playing a major role in maintaining the dynamics of the cloud forest ecosystem they live in. The bears in the Intag region of Ecuador are known to rip the bark off Brunelia trees. This causes the premature death and fall of the trees, creating clearings in the forest, allowing light to get through to the undergrowth, which permits smaller trees to grow and therefore promotes new life in the forest. Andean bears are very agile and often climb trees in search of bromeliads and fruits. In doing this, and jumping from tree to tree, they may break branches which again allows light to pass down to the undergrowth, and so promotes new growth. By eating fruits of the forest, the bears disperse seeds to other parts of the forest in their faeces. This is another method by which the Andean bear promotes natural regeneration of the cloud forest ecosystem, which is vital as the "lungs" of the planet and to maintain the natural water cycle. This role of the bear as a keystone species in its ecosystem means that it is important that the Andean bears are protected and supported with conservation initiatives if the cloud forest itself if to be saved, along with all the other wildlife it supports. To understand what needs to be done to conserve the bears, we are studying bear behavior. Andean Bear Conservation Project: Bear Ecology Ecology of the Andean bear, including bear habitat, range, diet, size and lifespan of the bears and their role as a keystone species. What Should Be Done With Yachak, the Cattle-Killing Bear of the Andes Conservationists and ranchers in Ecuador struggle to make peace while an elusive spectacled bear feasts on valuable livestock By Alastair Bland smithsonian.com April 3, 2013 n November 12, 2009, in the remote northern highlands of Ecuador not far south of Colombia, a pair of grazing bulls lost their footing on a steep, muddy slope. They slipped down the sheer face of a deep Andean ravine and landed dead in the small stream gully below. From This Story Some days later, a large spectacled bear picked up the smell of ripe flesh. The animal, a male, followed the scent trail down from its high cloud forest habitat and spent several days feasting on the carcasses—treasure troves of protein and fat for an animal that lives mostly on vegetables, fruits and tubers. The event, seemingly just another day in the high Andes, where bears and cattle have crossed paths for centuries, would spiral into one of the On November 12, 2009, in the remote northern highlands of Ecuador not far south of Colombia, a pair of grazing bulls lost their footing on a steep, muddy slope. They slipped down the sheer face of a deep Andean ravine and landed dead in the small stream gully below. Some days later, a large spectacled bear picked up the smell of ripe flesh. The animal, a male, followed the scent trail down from its high cloud forest habitat and spent several days feasting on the carcasses—treasure troves of protein and fat for an animal that lives mostly on vegetables, fruits and tubers. The event, seemingly just another day in the high Andes, where bears and cattle have crossed paths for centuries, would spiral into one of the most problematic sagas now affecting relations between local indigenous communities and the endangered spectacled bear. “That was the first time he ate beef,” says Andres Laguna, a Quito-based biologist with the Andean Bear Foundation who has been studying and resolving matters of bear-human conflict for several years. “Then, a few weeks later, he killed his first cow.” The male bear, Laguna says, quickly gained an irresistible taste for flesh and embarked on what has become an unstoppable and possibly unprecedented rampage of killings. The animal, which Laguna has nicknamed “Yachak”—the indigenous Quechua word for “wise man”—has now killed about 250 head of livestock in the northern provinces of Carchi and Imambura since his first taste of domesticated flesh. Months at a time do go by when the bear vanishes, but other times Yachak kills wantonly. In one week in 2012, for instance, he killed seven head of cattle. Many local ranchers would be perfectly glad to see Yachak dead, and unknown individuals have broken federal law in attempts to kill him. But Yachak, believed to be more than 15 years old, remains alive while, instead, about a dozen innocent bears have lost their lives to the bullets. Laguna says several bears have been shot from treetops while peacefully eating bromeliads, colorful epiphytic plants like jesters’ hats with starchy bulb-like hearts. Amid such lawless unrest, it’s clear that Yachak has compromised relations between conservationists and the people who live on the fringe of Ecuador’s dwindling bear habitat—and the conflict brings forth the question that wildlife managers in many places have to ask at times: Would the species be better off without this individual? In Montana, grizzly bears—a threatened species—are regularly culled from the population when they become habitual sheep or cattle killers. Mike Madel, a Montana bear conflict management biologist in the region known as the Northern Continental Divide Ecosystem, calls killing bears “the worst part of my job.” But, he says, it’s essential. “It’s so much better in the long run for social acceptance of the bears to remove the problem bear from the population,” Madel explains. “You just have to weigh the negative social influence that one or two bears that are killing cattle can have on an area. Just one bear, if you let it keep killing livestock, can cause dissention and cause people to start talking negatively. It can really drag down an entire recovery program.” In the late 1980s, when the grizzly population of northwestern Montana was crawling back from its historical low of about 350 in the 1970s, two grizzlies—a male and female living side by side for the short mating season—began killing cattle together. When the pair separated, they still wanted beef. “All of a sudden, we had two bears killing livestock,” remembers Madel, a 30-year veteran in his field. The female was relocated and successfully turned back onto a natural diet. The male, however, after a relocation effort, traversed the 150 miles back to the cattle country where he’d been trapped. Nicknamed the “Falls Creek Male,” the bear resumed killing—and did so for years. By 2001, this individual grizzly had killed more than 60 cows, Madel says, and incurred costs on ranchers topping $70,000. Other sources inflated that figure to as high as $200,000. Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/what-should-be-done-with-yachak-the-cattle-killing-bear-of-the-andes-15309413/#tGk0LBpGouA3pGYO.99 Edited by Warsaw2014, Dec 8 2014, 04:02 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Full Throttle | Aug 12 2015, 10:51 AM Post #7 |
![]()
Apex Predator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
![]() "Studies of carnivores have shown little support to the possibility of tigers Panthera tigris predating Malayan tapirs (Tapirus indicus) (Linkie and Ridout 2011). Similarly, lowland tapir (Tapirus terrestris) and Baird’s tapirs (Tapirus bairdii) are possibly part of the diet of jaguars (Panthera onca), nevertheless few records in scats exist (Weckel et al. 2006). In the high Andes, the potential predators of the mountain tapirs (Tapirus pinchaque) are pumas (Puma concolor) and Andean bears (Tremarctos ornatus). Some clues, such as mountain tapir hairs found in Andean bear feces and captured mountain tapirs carrying large scars presumably produced by Andean bears, have been reported (Castellanos 2011). However, hairs are not evidence of bears being able to attack tapirs, since they could also have been obtained from eating an already dead tapir. Direct evidence of mountain tapirs as preys of Andean bears has not been obtained yet. In this note we report an Andean bear attack on a mountain tapir. The picture (Fig. 1) is part of an ongoing effort to study large mammals in Purace and “Los Guacharos” Cave National Parks on the Central Andes of Colombia. From 6 December 2013 to 31 January 2014, 12 camera traps (Bushnell) were located in the area known as “Salado Granadillos”. Each camera trap was separated from the next by 50 meters in a linear transect. The camera traps recorded several mammals such as: mountain tapir, Andean bear, little coati (Nasuella olivácea), South American coati (Nasua nasua), Colombian weasel (Mustela felipei), white tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), little red brocket (Mazama rufina) and northern pudu (Pudu mephistophiles). A total of 234 pictures of mountain tapirs have been collected across 10 cameras so far. One of the pictures, taken on 2 January 2014 at 16:22 hours in the location 1° 52’ 19.9” N, -76° 27’ 5” W, showed clearly an Andean bear on top of the back of an adult mountain tapir. The Andean bear hangs by its paws, his head is visible and is not biting the tapir. The attacked animal seems to be walking fast or running and its head is blurry, nevertheless a mountain tapir is easily recognized in the picture by the size, color, and shape of the legs. We do not have enough evidence to affirm that the mountain tapir was killed as result of the attack, so we do not report it as a predation event. However, we consider the event as a predation attempt of an Andean bear on a mountain tapir, an event never previously recorded. It is interesting that in the picture, the attack is on an adult animal, despite young tapirs being expected to be more susceptible to predation. Tapirs have the ability to run through thick understory and dive into rivers. A running tapir is able to break through bushes with branches 2-3 inches (5-8 cm) thick (Schauenberg 1969). An Andean bear gripping the back of the tapir will have a hard time holding on to its prey while it runs through the thick understory. Andean bears are omnivorous but mainly frugivorous/folivorous (García-Rangel 2012) displaying a strong preference for bromeliads (Goldstein 2004, Troya et al. 2004). Nevertheless, they also have been reported as predators of cattle (Goldstein et al. 2006). If Andean bears are able to kill a cow or a horse, which are usually much heavier than mountain tapirs, it is likely that they are also able to prey on a mountain tapir. The picture recorded at Purace NP together with previous records of tapir hairs in bear fecal samples, confirm that Andean bears do attack mountain tapirs, and thus, lends support to the hypothesis that Andean bears prey on mountain tapirs." "Several tapirs was wounded, killed and eaten by andean bears in La Bonita, Sigsipamba Papallacta and Quijos were identified."
|
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Feb 10 2017, 03:38 PM Post #8 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
Andean Bears Call Machu Picchu Home By Mindy Weisberger, Senior Writer | February 8, 2017 06:43am ET ![]() A year-long survey found Andean bears in more than 95 percent of the study area within the Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu, one of the most visited places in South America. Credit: Copyright Ever Chuchullo Machu Picchu, the site of historic Incan ruins and a popular destination for tourists, is also a favorite destination for South America's only native bear species — the Andean bear. In a recent survey of the Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu, park officials and conservationists found signs of Andean bears (Tremarctos ornatus) in most of the Peruvian site, revealing that the bears are more widespread and more established in the famous Incan ruins than was previously suspected, representatives from the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) announced Jan. 26 in a statement. Machu Picchu is registered as a World Heritage Site by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and is one of only 35 sites recognized for both cultural and natural significance. The survey's findings will help officials better preserve the bears' habitat as researchers continue to investigate the Andean bears' lifestyle and habits, about which little is known. Sometimes referred to as spectacled bears due to pale yellow or white markings around their eyes, Andean bears are omnivores that measure up to 6.6 feet (2 meters) in length and can weigh as much as 400 pounds (181 kilograms). They live in the forests and grasslands of the Andes Mountains, ranging from Venezuela to Bolivia. ![]() More than 30 trained researchers and park officials participated in the recent year-long survey for Andean bears in the Machu Picchu sanctuary. Credit: Diego Peréz/WCS Peru For the Machu Picchu survey, the WCS partnered with the Peruvian federal agency Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas por el Estado (SERNANP). From August 2014 to September 2015, 30 park officials and researchers investigated rainforest and grassland habitats, searching for evidence of Andean bears — scat, footprints and feeding signs. They found evidence in abundance — traces of Andean bears appeared in more than 95 percent of an area of Machu Picchu measuring 142 square miles (368 square kilometers), according to the WCS. Machu Picchu draws over 2,500 human visitors daily, the Peruvian Times reported in 2014, but interactions between bears and people remain rare. Though Andean bears are active during the daytime, they are shy and avoid contact with humans, according to the World Wildlife Fund for Nature. Video footage captured in 2016 shows a young Andean bear climbing over the ruins at the site in close proximity to tourists, but this was under highly unusual circumstances, officials told Peruvian news station Canal N. The bear had been startled by a Peruvian helicopter circling overhead, which violated the area's no-fly zone, Fertur Peruvian Travel Blog reported. The survey also determined that the Machu Picchu bears are part of a larger group of Andean bears that intermingle via grassland "corridors" — natural connections between separated habitats — that occur at elevations of more than 11,000 feet (3,400 meters) above sea level. "It is amazing that this world famous location is also [an] important habitat for Andean bears," Isaac Goldstein, coordinator of WCS's Andean Bear Program, said in a statement. "The results of the survey will help us to understand the needs of this species and how to manage Andean bears in this location." http://www.livescience.com/57794-andean-bears-in-machu-picchu.html |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Hyaenidae & Ursidae · Next Topic » |

















![]](http://b2.ifrm.com/28122/87/0/p701956/pipright.png)





2:20 AM Jul 14