Welcome Guest [Log In] [Register]
Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit.


You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free.


Join our community!


If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features:

Username:   Password:
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 6
  • 23
Tyrannosaurus rex v Ankylosaurus magniventris
Topic Started: Jan 28 2012, 10:08 PM (48,662 Views)
Taipan
Member Avatar
Administrator

Tyrannosaurus rex
Tyrannosaurus is a genus of coelurosaurian theropod dinosaur. The species Tyrannosaurus rex (rex meaning "king" in Latin), commonly abbreviated to T. rex, is a fixture in popular culture. It lived throughout what is now western North America, with a much wider range than other tyrannosaurids. Fossils are found in a variety of rock formations dating to the Maastrichtian age of the upper Cretaceous Period, 67 to 65.5 million years ago. It was among the last non-avian dinosaurs to exist before the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event. Like other tyrannosaurids, Tyrannosaurus was a bipedal carnivore with a massive skull balanced by a long, heavy tail. Relative to the large and powerful hindlimbs, Tyrannosaurus forelimbs were small, though unusually powerful for their size, and bore two clawed digits. Although other theropods rivaled or exceeded Tyrannosaurus rex in size, it was the largest known tyrannosaurid and one of the largest known land predators. By far the largest carnivore in its environment, Tyrannosaurus rex may have been an apex predator, preying upon hadrosaurs and ceratopsians, although some experts have suggested it was primarily a scavenger. The debate over Tyrannosaurus as apex predator or scavenger is among the longest running in paleontology. Tyrannosaurus rex was one of the largest land carnivores of all time; the largest complete specimen, FMNH PR2081 ("Sue"), measured 12.8 metres (42 ft) long, and was 4.0 metres (13.1 ft) tall at the hips. Mass estimates have varied widely over the years, from more than 7.2 metric tons (7.9 short tons), to less than 4.5 metric tons (5.0 short tons), with most modern estimates ranging between 5.4 and 6.8 metric tons (6.0 and 7.5 short tons). Packard et al. (2009) tested dinosaur mass estimation procedures on elephants and concluded that dinosaur estimations are flawed and produce over-estimations; thus, the weight of Tyrannosaurus could be much less than usually estimated. Other estimations have concluded that the largest known Tyrannosaurus specimens had a weight exceeding 9 tonnes.

Posted Image

Ankylosaurus magniventris
Ankylosaurus is a genus of ankylosaurid dinosaur, containing one species, A. magniventris. Fossils of Ankylosaurus are found in geologic formations dating to the very end of the Cretaceous Period (about 66.5–65.5 Ma ago) in western North America. Although a complete skeleton has not been discovered and several other dinosaurs are represented by more extensive fossil material, Ankylosaurus is often considered the archetypal armored dinosaur. Other ankylosaurids shared its well-known features—the heavily-armored body and massive bony tail club—but Ankylosaurus was the largest known member of the family. In comparison with modern land animals the adult Ankylosaurus was very large. Some scientists have estimated a length of 9 meters (30 ft). Another reconstruction suggests a significantly smaller size, at 6.25 m (20.5 ft) long, up to 1.5 m (5 ft) wide and about 1.7 m (5.5 ft) high at the hip. Ankylosaurus may have weighed over 6,000 kilograms (13,000 lb), making it one of the heaviest armored dinosaurs yet discovered. The body shape was low-slung and quite wide. It was quadrupedal, with the hind limbs longer than the forelimbs. Although its feet are still unknown, comparisons with other ankylosaurids suggest Ankylosaurus probably had five toes on each foot. The skull was low and triangular in shape, wider than it was long. The largest known skull measures 64.5 centimeters (25 in) long and 74.5 cm (29 in) wide.

Posted Image

______________________________________________________________________________

Prehistoric Cat
 
Tyrannosaurus VS Ankylosaurus
Edited by Taipan, May 25 2018, 11:58 PM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Replies:
Fragillimus335
Omnivore
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Dark allosaurus
Aug 26 2012, 03:32 AM
brolyeuphyfusion
Aug 26 2012, 03:31 AM

Nuff said...

Also, Walking With Dinosaurs states that Ankylosaurus had a mass of 7 tonnes iirc, making it larger than Tyrannosaurus
7 tonnes would be probable the same size as Tyrannosaurus rather than bigger
Actually all of these estimates are too high. Ken carpenter recently re-described Anky at 6.25 meters long and 3-4 tons. The old 9 meter, 7 ton estimates were from ancient papers. Posted Image
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
DinosaurMichael
Member Avatar
Apex Predator
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Fragillimus335
Aug 28 2012, 11:46 PM
Dark allosaurus
Aug 26 2012, 03:32 AM
brolyeuphyfusion
Aug 26 2012, 03:31 AM

Nuff said...

Also, Walking With Dinosaurs states that Ankylosaurus had a mass of 7 tonnes iirc, making it larger than Tyrannosaurus
7 tonnes would be probable the same size as Tyrannosaurus rather than bigger
Actually all of these estimates are too high. Ken carpenter recently re-described Anky at 6.25 meters long and 3-4 tons. The old 9 meter, 7 ton estimates were from ancient papers. Posted Image
For all we know. 3-4 tons could possibly be it's average, while 6 tons could of been it's max.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Rammus
Member Avatar
Autotrophic Organism
[ *  * ]
Ankylosaurus wins. Its not going to sit there and let T.Rex bite the crap out of it. And I don't think the T.Rex was that agile.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Verdugo
Member Avatar
Large Carnivores Enthusiast
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
Quote:
 
Posted Image

Hmm, T rex wins with ease. It's just too big
Edited by Verdugo, Sep 16 2012, 12:16 AM.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Mauro20
Member Avatar
Badass
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
In a fight to the death, Tyrannosaurus wins, in my opinion. This would not be easy, anyway.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
ordraco
Member Avatar
Unicellular Organism
[ * ]
brolyeuphyfusion
Aug 26 2012, 03:31 AM

Nuff said...

Also, Walking With Dinosaurs states that Ankylosaurus had a mass of 7 tonnes iirc, making it larger than Tyrannosaurus

Ankylosaurus has been vastly over sized and a bit overrated when it comes to that club it's got,Its already been mentioned but its also too large there
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Archosaur
Unicellular Organism
[ * ]
TerrorBird
Aug 5 2012, 03:30 AM
Jinfengopteryx
Aug 2 2012, 05:52 PM
Prehistoric Cat
Aug 2 2012, 07:31 AM
Cat
Aug 1 2012, 02:27 AM
Prehistoric Cat
Jul 31 2012, 11:57 PM
Tyrannosaurus based on the 1.5m long skull, Ankylosaurus based on the largest skull (~65cm long)
Posted Image
If that size comparison is really accurate then I would lean towards T-rex, but there is no doubt that the tail club would still have been very dangerous for the predator.
Notice that the Tail is very short to be dangerous to Tyrannosaurus, and don't forget that Ankylosaurus had short legs, wide body and armor, which made it very very very slow
Well, rhinos and hippos also can turn fast, even if their legs are short. The tail should be long enough to hit a leg
I agree with you. Also keep in mind that there are valid published reports that say there were color patterns on the ankly so that it had one dot on each side of the tail-club, which made it resemble the eyes on the head of the ankly. This is called "mimicing", so that Tyranny would bite at the tail-club but gain nothing from the bite. So, there was no such thing that ankly was ever facing the wrong way when Tyranny approached.
Isn't the ankylosaurs tail disproportionally short?
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
theropod
Member Avatar
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
poor anky. they seemingly where really oversized a lot (eve tough the comparison should assume a 1,4m skull from the excerpts from brochus paper that I have read). no way it could be heavier than rex, and it doesn´t seem like it would have been able to cause fatal damage swift enough.
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Verdugo
Member Avatar
Large Carnivores Enthusiast
[ *  *  *  *  * ]
theropod
Oct 14 2012, 02:47 AM
poor anky. they seemingly where really oversized a lot (eve tough the comparison should assume a 1,4m skull from the excerpts from brochus paper that I have read). no way it could be heavier than rex, and it doesn´t seem like it would have been able to cause fatal damage swift enough.
This is weird, i thought that Ankylosaurus was evolved to fend up against T rex, i didn't know it was an easy meal for any T rex
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
theropod
Member Avatar
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
it´s really weird. but beign that small it seems very unlikely for it to successfully defend itself. it would just need to be bigger, otherwise the blunt trauma it will cause cannot fatally harm something as big as rex
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dinosaur
Heterotrophic Organism
[ *  *  * ]
Victory for the tyrant lizard king!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
Carcharadon
Member Avatar
Shark Toothed Reptile
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
mismatch, ankylosaurus size is exaggurated, t.rex is far too big and deadly
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SpinoInWonderland
The madness has come back...
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
Tyrannosaurus wins, nevermind my previous posts here...
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
dinosaur
Heterotrophic Organism
[ *  *  * ]
brolyeuphyfusion
Dec 30 2012, 01:19 PM
Tyrannosaurus wins, nevermind my previous posts here...
Wow! Finally! :D you favor the king for once!
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
SpinoInWonderland
The madness has come back...
[ *  *  *  *  *  *  *  * ]
dinosaur
Dec 30 2012, 04:32 PM
brolyeuphyfusion
Dec 30 2012, 01:19 PM
Tyrannosaurus wins, nevermind my previous posts here...
Wow! Finally! :D you favor the king for once!
Tyrannosaurus is not the king!!!!! realmad
Offline Profile Quote Post Goto Top
 
2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous)
Go to Next Page
« Previous Topic · Dinosauria Interspecific Conflict · Next Topic »
Add Reply
  • Pages:
  • 1
  • 6
  • 23

Find this theme on Forum2Forum.net & ZNR exclusively.