| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Felids vs Canids at parity, who's stronger?; Who's stronger and most capable in a fight at parity? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Jul 31 2012, 11:41 AM (44,644 Views) | |
| Animal King | Jun 23 2013, 08:52 AM Post #346 |
|
Heterotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Alright thanks I guess I didn't mean to be disrespectful or anything just saying my opinion. I'll stop posting. |
![]() |
|
| Vita | Jun 23 2013, 09:43 AM Post #347 |
![]()
Cave Canem
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Grandej221, Would you agree that a working breed who spends its life as nothing more than a beloved pet is "soft" or "unconditioned" when compared to its working counterparts? Every now and again you'll come across a well toned pet dog, but in general, working breeds are in better condition. They're stronger, possess more stamina and (assuming they're a gripping breed) will bite harder. It is no different for wild animals. |
![]() |
|
| kuri | Jun 23 2013, 04:00 PM Post #348 |
|
Omnivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
be cool, the main problem were the "hundreds" reply. Make less replys and use the quoting function. |
![]() |
|
| Veli | Jun 23 2013, 07:54 PM Post #349 |
|
Heterotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
canids, of course |
![]() |
|
| FelinePowah | Jun 23 2013, 08:17 PM Post #350 |
![]()
Pussy Lover
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ha ha in your dreams kiddo |
![]() |
|
| Veli | Jun 24 2013, 11:12 PM Post #351 |
|
Heterotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Edited by Veli, Jun 24 2013, 11:12 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Jun 25 2013, 12:08 AM Post #352 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Uhm, could you write a comment what backs up your claim, instead of using one of these dumb images? |
![]() |
|
| Vivec | Jun 25 2013, 12:36 AM Post #353 |
|
Canid and snake enthusiast.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
There hasn't been yet one comment backing up the felines, is it a necessity? Unless we compare all felines and canids extinct and extant we can't make a fair or truly accurate comparison. |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Jun 25 2013, 12:39 AM Post #354 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I didn't want to say that he is off, I just wanted to say that this is not an adequate answer. FP of course wasn't better either.
Edited by Jinfengopteryx, Jun 25 2013, 12:39 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Vivec | Jun 25 2013, 12:41 AM Post #355 |
|
Canid and snake enthusiast.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well if someones going to assume they're a kiddo then it really wouldn't be to far off to use the same immaturity in the reply. Personally I wouldn't give an educated reply to a sarcastic reply like that. |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Jun 25 2013, 12:44 AM Post #356 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I would say in such a case it would be the best not to reply. Although I would try to justify myself.
Edited by Jinfengopteryx, Jun 25 2013, 12:45 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Bandog | Jun 25 2013, 05:45 AM Post #357 |
![]()
Everything else is just a dog.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Ursus has dug through much info to provide at least enough data to allow opinions to be formed on the matter. |
![]() |
|
| k9boy | Jun 25 2013, 06:32 AM Post #358 |
![]()
Apex Predator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Smaller dogs vs smaller cats is generally even, for example pitbulls beat bobcats whilst lynx beat collies. Pumas and leopards are too much for any similarly sized canid though. |
![]() |
|
| Ursus arctos | Jun 25 2013, 06:57 AM Post #359 |
|
Autotrophic Organism
![]()
|
The problem is I haven't posted (much) info yet! Mostly just references, and occasionally listing numbers. I'm redoing the work to make it easier to follow, and then intend to finally post it and let everyone see. Anyway:
I definitely agree. I wouldn't necessarily make the connection that larger muscles -> advantage in a fight or ability to subdue larger prey with the limbs. Based on recent evidence regarding power output of the cheetah, I would also suggest that-despite work and power being proportional to muscle mass-muscle mass is apparently not very strongly correlated with power output. In greyhounds many of the most important muscles for running are much larger than they are for (captive) cheetahs, yet wild cheetahs could produce over twice the power relative to weight. I wonder to what extant it is related to captive vs wild cheetahs? The cheetahs were captive, albeit in large enclosures enabling them the opportunity to run but unlikely at high speeds, and had died of natural causes and therefore some alterations in architecture associated with lack of exercise must be assumed (Blazevich et al. 2003). -Hudson, et al (2012), the article the cheetah muscle info came from. ...but I doubt wild cheetahs have larger muscles than the greyhounds. Let alone twice their size. EDIT:
In the grand scheme of what kuri was talking about: so..why should a dog have bigger muscles, when it uses his muscles only for running? What I said is exactly relevant. Not only the triceps (which are among the largest muscles in these quadrupeds) are large. Forearm muscles are smaller in canids, however. Decathlete vs marathon runner is also a poor example. Marathon runners sustain low speeds, and require little acceleration - meaning little power is needed. This is not so with canids, which must attain high speeds. If their muscles are less powerful/muscle mass than those of felids, this would require greater mass. In addition, animals living in more open environments have larger muscle mass/body mass. Highly arboreal animals are the least heavily muscled. Clearly, the relationships between behaviour and morphology in animals are not as indicated by Kuri or Felinepowah. Edited by Ursus arctos, Jun 25 2013, 07:04 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Vivec | Jun 25 2013, 07:12 AM Post #360 |
|
Canid and snake enthusiast.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
The most muscled cat (Jaguar) is more muscular than the current most muscular canid (Grey Wolf), but without adding on the extinct cats and canids, we can not make a good assumption on the matter. the individual animal counts more, therefore I will not call one family being significantly more powerful than the other. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Zoological Debate & Discussion · Next Topic » |





![]](http://b2.ifrm.com/28122/87/0/p701956/pipright.png)









2:09 AM Jul 14