| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Interspecific Conflict Guidelines & Requests | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 25 2012, 08:32 PM (77,610 Views) | |
| Taipan | Aug 25 2012, 08:32 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
Leave them here. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Carcharadon | Feb 7 2013, 09:14 AM Post #391 |
![]()
Shark Toothed Reptile
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sauroniops vs mapusaurus |
![]() |
|
| DinosaurMichael | Feb 7 2013, 10:31 PM Post #392 |
|
Apex Predator
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Mapusaurus v Sauroniops Edited by DinosaurMichael, Feb 7 2013, 10:40 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Carcharadon | Feb 11 2013, 04:10 AM Post #393 |
![]()
Shark Toothed Reptile
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Giganotosaurus vs Shantungosaurus
Edited by Carcharadon, Feb 13 2013, 12:04 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Sheroo | Feb 13 2013, 01:25 AM Post #394 |
|
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Edmarka or Saurophaganax vs Torvosaurus and Therizinosaurus vs Deinocherius |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Feb 13 2013, 01:47 AM Post #395 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Saurophaganax vs Torvosaurus already exists, and Edmarka is probably synonymous with Torvo (at least the european specimen of which seems to have been exagerated in size considerably). |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Feb 14 2013, 08:00 PM Post #396 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
1. Shantungosaurus v Giganotosaurus |
![]() |
|
| Maelstrom | Feb 20 2013, 08:31 PM Post #397 |
![]()
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Since <Large Theropod> vs Diplodocus seem to end quite predictably, how about a large theropod vs a slightly bigger Diplodocid: Giganotosaurus vs Barosaurus? |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Feb 20 2013, 09:11 PM Post #398 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
since when is barosaurus larger than diplodocus, they´re about the same lenght actually... |
![]() |
|
| Maelstrom | Feb 21 2013, 02:56 AM Post #399 |
![]()
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I know they were about the same length, but most sources I've seen estimate Barosaurus at around 15-20 tonnes (some even higher but I don't really believe them) - I think it is proportionally heavier. The Seebacher result was 20,039 kg (source). |
![]() |
|
| Godzillasaurus | Feb 21 2013, 03:00 AM Post #400 |
|
Reptile King
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
This post has been moved to the Non-Dinosauria section
Edited by Godzillasaurus, Feb 21 2013, 06:05 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| theropod | Feb 22 2013, 05:26 AM Post #401 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
seebacher also estimates diplodocus at nearly 20t. I've searched for barosaurus in the paper, but I didn't get any results... I'm not that well informed in this regard, so I could be wrong, but I don't think Barosaurus is considerably bulkier |
![]() |
|
| Maelstrom | Feb 22 2013, 06:19 AM Post #402 |
![]()
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I too noticed that, Wikipedia reliability is somewhat debatable but it also lists Barosaurus at 20+ tonnes with a reference and lists Diplodocus at 11-16 tonnes. Other then them I can't seem to find any other information concerning it though. I don't think this is the right place to derail into Barosaurus estimates though. |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Feb 22 2013, 06:26 AM Post #403 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
1. The Diplodocus mount he used was from 1910! The one for Barosaurus was far newer (I'm not one of these newer=better guys, but there's a huge difference between a mount from 1910 and one from 1997!). What do you mean with you found nothing? The papers Seebacher cites don't have to give weight estimates. He just uses their mounts or given lengths, to estimate the weight of dinosaurs. |
![]() |
|
| Carcharadon | Feb 22 2013, 10:18 AM Post #404 |
![]()
Shark Toothed Reptile
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Tyrannotitan vs agustinia This sauropod weighs 8 tons |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Feb 23 2013, 07:59 PM Post #405 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
1. Agustinia v Tyrannotitan |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Dinosauria Interspecific Conflict · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Dinosauria light | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:24 AM Jul 14
|
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy


)








![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)


2:24 AM Jul 14