| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Interspecific Conflict Guidelines & Requests | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 25 2012, 08:32 PM (77,607 Views) | |
| Taipan | Aug 25 2012, 08:32 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
Leave them here. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Ausar | Apr 12 2013, 09:29 AM Post #436 |
|
Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Tyrannosaurus vs. Sauroniops. |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Apr 13 2013, 04:06 AM Post #437 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I don't think enough is known about that dinosaur. P.S. I think we have enough such therads. They are always the same. |
![]() |
|
| Ausar | Apr 14 2013, 02:35 AM Post #438 |
|
Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Albertosaurus (pack of 3) vs. Nasutuceratops. |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Apr 14 2013, 08:53 PM Post #439 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
Would it differ much from this matchup? : Triceratops vs Albertosaurus (pack of 3) |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Apr 16 2013, 04:15 AM Post #440 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Agreed. T. rex vs same or larger sized Carnosaur is always the same, there will be some who favour the carnosaur, most will say T. rex wins because of bite force no new arguments Boring, I'd recommend not making such matchups any more, they are in lack of the kind of contributions that actually has scientific value. carnosaur vs carnosaur or tyrannosaur vs tyrannosaur is often more even in terms of supporters and there are fewer biased and more toughtful. |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Apr 16 2013, 04:21 AM Post #441 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
T rex vs some Carnosaur is even in terms of supporters aswell. |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Apr 16 2013, 06:06 AM Post #442 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Really? if I view the page with another browser that's not logged in and have a look at the polls, or If I just have a look at the comments, T. rex is clearly favoured everywhere (the sad and unrightful record holder seems to be M. roseae vs T. rex, leaving aside Tyrannotitan over which it is downright overwhelmingly favoured...). No, some new carnosaur would just be the same story unless we find onw that has the exact same built and jaw morphology as T. rex. And all the bias involved in both sides' argumentation also makes those who usually post good stuff just try and repeat the few good arguments that are brought up instead of bringing up the useful stuff. Unless you think Intraspecific conflict scenarios are ONLY for entertainment and you find this type of argument entertaining, there's no reason to make more of these matchups. |
![]() |
|
| MightyMaus | Apr 16 2013, 07:40 AM Post #443 |
![]()
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I really think this needs to be expanded to all extinct non-mammals. There are only so many well know dinos. In any case, how about Dacentrurus vs Therizinosaurus? |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Apr 16 2013, 10:36 PM Post #444 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
1. Therizinosaurus cheloniformis v Dacentrurus armatus |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Apr 17 2013, 04:04 AM Post #445 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
From what I remember, Carcharodontosaurus vs Tyrannosaurus was rather equal. |
![]() |
|
| theropod | Apr 17 2013, 04:51 AM Post #446 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
T. rex had around 1/3 more votes, I wouldn't call that equal. Those who dared to comment might have been a bit more balanced tough, still in all those conflicts there is always the same tendency. |
![]() |
|
| Ausar | Apr 17 2013, 07:44 PM Post #447 |
|
Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Guanlong vs. Yinlong? |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Apr 18 2013, 08:40 PM Post #448 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
1. Yinlong downsi v Guanlong wucaii |
![]() |
|
| Carcharadon | Apr 20 2013, 06:21 AM Post #449 |
![]()
Shark Toothed Reptile
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Austroraptor vs achillobator
Edited by Carcharadon, Apr 20 2013, 06:23 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Ausar | Apr 20 2013, 12:35 PM Post #450 |
|
Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can! Xi-miqa-can!
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Coahuillaceratops vs. Rubeosaurus. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Dinosauria Interspecific Conflict · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Dinosauria light | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:24 AM Jul 14
|
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy


)







![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)



2:24 AM Jul 14