| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Interspecific Conflict Guidelines & Requests | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Aug 25 2012, 08:32 PM (77,575 Views) | |
| Taipan | Aug 25 2012, 08:32 PM Post #1 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
Leave them here. |
![]() |
|
| Replies: | |
|---|---|
| Deleted User | May 18 2015, 09:05 PM Post #916 |
|
Deleted User
|
Well it hunted sauropods and probably could not bring them down in its own. And several othe carnosaurs most likely hunted in packs such as mapusaurus and carcharadontosaurus. |
|
|
| theropod | May 19 2015, 01:55 AM Post #917 |
|
palaeontology, open source and survival enthusiast
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
^That’s never enough for him. But regardless of that, two Shaochilong would be a better match imo, considering that Shaochilong is about half the mass of Concavenator. |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | May 19 2015, 05:38 PM Post #918 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
As Theropod said, you'll need more evidence that that. 1 on 1 battles are very welcome. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | May 19 2015, 06:53 PM Post #919 |
|
Deleted User
|
If it were one on one you would claim it to be a Mismatch. And I remember seeing a thread where it was 5 allosaurus vs spinosaurus. And utahraptor pack of 12 vs brachiosaurus yet you still allowed those, why? |
|
|
| Taipan | May 19 2015, 08:31 PM Post #920 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
I wasnt refering to the two species you requested - simply saying 1 0n 1 matchups in general are prefered.
A precedent was set prior to me moderating this part of the forum. |
![]() |
|
| Deleted User | May 19 2015, 08:46 PM Post #921 |
|
Deleted User
|
Ok I musinderstood you. I looked at the brach vs Utah thread and it said you were the author of that post.( I'm not trying to argue) |
|
|
| bone crusher | Jun 8 2015, 04:04 PM Post #922 |
|
Heterotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
T.Rex vs 2 Suchomimus If we're using Sue's Hutchinson figure 9.5 tons as a basis or even Scott Hartman's 8400kg or 9.25 short ton vs a 4-5 tons Sucho then we should have a fun match. |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Jun 9 2015, 09:56 PM Post #923 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
Is there evidence that Suchomimus fought cooperatively against opponents? |
![]() |
|
| bone crusher | Jun 10 2015, 10:00 PM Post #924 |
|
Heterotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Well T Rex did in that Dinosaur Revolution Docu when the female rex helped her male mate fending off the invading lone male, so I don't see why Suchomimus couldn't. |
![]() |
|
| Ceratodromeus | Jun 11 2015, 03:25 AM Post #925 |
|
Aspiring herpetologist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Nope.
S. tenerensis was ~2.5-3 tons, not 4-5. Edited by Ceratodromeus, Jun 11 2015, 03:27 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Jul 22 2015, 09:53 PM Post #926 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
1. Opisthocoelicaudia skarzynskii v Tarbosaurus bataar |
![]() |
|
| TheFatCharlatan | Aug 16 2015, 06:44 AM Post #927 |
![]()
Unicellular Organism
![]() ![]() ![]()
|
How about Pachycephalosaurus vs Neovenator? |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Aug 16 2015, 03:19 PM Post #928 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
Weight issues: It measured approximately 7.6 meters (25 feet) in length, and was of a gracile build, weighting 1000–2000 kg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neovenator It has been estimated that Pachycephalosaurus was around 4.5 metres (15 ft) long and weighed 450 kilograms (990 lb). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pachycephalosaurus Maybe this would be better. 1. Pachycephalosaurus wyomingensis v Dilophosaurus wetherilli |
![]() |
|
| Lukose | Aug 17 2015, 12:04 PM Post #929 |
|
Autotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Perhaps Marshosaurus bicentesimus vs Leptoceratops gracilis? |
![]() |
|
| Taipan | Aug 17 2015, 10:34 PM Post #930 |
![]()
Administrator
![]()
|
M. bicentesimus is probably too large. This maybe better. 1. Leptoceratops gracilis v Liliensternus liliensterni |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
|
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Dinosauria Interspecific Conflict · Next Topic » |
| Theme: Dinosauria light | Track Topic · E-mail Topic |
2:24 AM Jul 14
|
Powered by ZetaBoards Premium · Privacy Policy


)







![]](http://z4.ifrm.com/static/1/pip_r.png)


2:24 AM Jul 14