| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Why did mammals take over? | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Nov 19 2012, 12:04 PM (5,720 Views) | |
| Mesopredator | Dec 17 2016, 04:16 AM Post #76 |
|
Disaster taxa
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I'm no Darren Naish, but would agree with Sherman above that morphology is the most important reason. Um, also, take over is vague. Plants, birds and insects took over if you ask me. Mammals are not that numerous. They might be the largest, sure thing. They might - usually - be the most influential on the environment, sure. But took over? Maybe... |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Zoological Debate & Discussion · Next Topic » |





![]](http://b2.ifrm.com/28122/87/0/p701956/pipright.png)



2:09 AM Jul 14