| Welcome to Carnivora. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Sumatran Tiger: The true Pound for Pound King of Cats | |
|---|---|
| Tweet Topic Started: Apr 7 2013, 05:35 PM (7,089 Views) | |
| Black Ice | Apr 8 2013, 02:31 PM Post #16 |
![]()
Drom King
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Double post.
Edited by Black Ice, Apr 8 2013, 02:37 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Canis Warrior | Apr 8 2013, 11:19 PM Post #17 |
|
Canidae expert
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Their from thailand the fight didnt last long I am posting the doc Edited by Canis Warrior, Apr 8 2013, 11:21 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| TIKI | Apr 9 2013, 03:16 AM Post #18 |
![]()
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Guess what? Those tigers are also bigger than Sumatran tigers. If a Bengal tiger is that much bigger than a Indochinese tiger, than it's substantially larger than a Sumatran. PS. You called them Indonesian tigers. No such thing. Sumatran tigers are from a city in Indonesia called Sumatra. Indochinese tigers are found in Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam and southwestern China. Edited by TIKI, Apr 9 2013, 03:17 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| ManEater | Apr 9 2013, 03:29 AM Post #19 |
|
Omnivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sumatra is an Island, not a city dude. |
![]() |
|
| Sicilianu | Apr 9 2013, 04:38 AM Post #20 |
![]()
Omnivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I am a little lost... I thought we were talking pound for pound? Does someone really think a Bengal would lose to a Sumatran in a fight? I know the thread was probably made to be inflammatory over anything else, but that would be ridiculous. |
![]() |
|
| Canis Warrior | Apr 9 2013, 09:10 AM Post #21 |
|
Canidae expert
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
and they never had to separate him from the indochinese tiger which is a real subspecies is real are you that stupid TIKIN all of your info is false. |
![]() |
|
| TIKI | Apr 9 2013, 09:59 AM Post #22 |
![]()
Herbivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I said the Indochinese tiger is real. You called it the indonesian tiger. Calling someone stupid. How old are you?
|
![]() |
|
| Canis Warrior | Apr 9 2013, 11:21 PM Post #23 |
|
Canidae expert
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
TKI you are wrong yet again I posted indochinese and heres the proof |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Apr 10 2013, 03:00 AM Post #24 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
I agree. Such topics always will be subjective. You can maybe post something like that in matchups, but I don't see the point of making a whole therad for that. |
![]() |
|
| Vivec | Apr 10 2013, 03:13 AM Post #25 |
|
Canid and snake enthusiast.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Where? |
![]() |
|
| Canis Warrior | Apr 10 2013, 07:54 AM Post #26 |
|
Canidae expert
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
read what I quoted |
![]() |
|
| genao87 | Apr 10 2013, 02:56 PM Post #27 |
|
Heterotrophic Organism
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
it was mentioned before that the Summantra Tiger was powerful and stocky compare to most tiger subspecies but I never got to the point of the data supporting that claim. I know one of the past extinct Tigers that was small, probably smaller than most of the tiger subspecies discovered, was pretty stocky. |
![]() |
|
| ImperialDino | Apr 11 2013, 06:54 PM Post #28 |
|
Omnivore
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Sumatran Tigers can defeat the Bengal sometimes, but not most times, being that's it's too small. There is alot of FALSE TALK about Jaguars pound for pound this or Leopards pound for pound that, without much thought. Sumatran Tigers can take prey that Jaguars could only dream of. |
![]() |
|
| Jinfengopteryx | Apr 13 2013, 04:20 AM Post #29 |
![]()
Aspiring paleontologist, science enthusiast and armchair speculative fiction/evolution writer
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
Maybe becaue Jaguars don't coexist with so many big things? |
![]() |
|
| Canis Warrior | Apr 15 2013, 12:30 PM Post #30 |
|
Canidae expert
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
|
my case closed TIKI has been proven wrong |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Zoological Debate & Discussion · Next Topic » |






![]](http://b2.ifrm.com/28122/87/0/p701956/pipright.png)







2:05 AM Jul 14